Categories
Phillosoph

Coveralls: A Dose of Mono

I was watching an episode of MacGyver where they break into a museum to steal a jade dragon. No gloves, and they go in through a ventilation duct. All high security buildings have spotlessly clean air ducts large enough to accommodate fully grown men, naturally.
Miliciana wearing monos
In such a situation, I think to myself, drab-colour coveralls would probably a very good idea.
After the heist, the coveralls may be discarded to eliminate forensic evidence and change appearance. Anyone who looks like they have been crawling through dirty air ducts is going to draw attention.
Also, dressed in drab-coloured “boiler suits”, anyone that does see you may assume they are seeing maintenance or cleaners. You are probably less likely to be challenged than someone in wandering around in civies or a black polo neck.
The approach or departure to the target building may involve moving though rural terrain or parkland. A drab-coloured coverall provides a measure of camouflage in such conditions.
As an aside, I know of an airgunner who used to hunt wearing a pilot's flight suit. It was a single colour, but the loose cut created folds and patches of shade that tended to break up his shape. Fooled the bunnies, anyhow!
Around the same day as I was watching that Macgyver episode, I had been reading one of James White's “Sector General” books.
Implied in the book was that Monitor Corps personnel spend a lot of time wearing coveralls. Since most of the Monitor Corps in the books are spaceship crews or perform maintenance on the hospital station, and changing into environmental suits is fairly common, this makes good sense.
If I was designing a military-style organization from scratch, a range of coveralls for general and working wear seems a good start. Like the Spanish nearly a century ago, it may be found they are useful for field wear too.
That night, a Ghostbusters movie comes on. Dark tan coveralls are their uniform.
Before was an episode of Knight Rider, and it looks like the henchmen are wearing dark blue coveralls with a beret and police belt.
I also watched the Indian movie “Fighter”, where everyone is wearing flight suits, even if they are just cadets marching around the academy grounds.
At least two or three Bond films have the henchman spear-carriers in coveralls.
Synchronicity, or is the universe telling me to write about coveralls?

Coveralls, Overalls, Boiler Suits and Jump Suits

In British English, coverall and overall are essentially interchangeable. Americans reserve “overall” for the bib-and-brace type garment that paradoxically leaves the arms and shoulders uncovered. Brits usually call the latter “dungarees”, not to be confused with the USMC garments of the same name! Mia Goth demonstrates American overalls don't cover all below:
Mia Goth in dungarees/overalls
“Boiler suit” is another term for a coverall, unless aircrew are wearing them, when they become flight suits. Jumpsuits tend to be a snugger cut, particularly if used for free-fall jumps.
Honourable mention goes to the siren suits that helped many Brits through the Blitz.

Raider Wear

Another episode of MacGyver features Treasury men raiding a nightclub. This provides the bizarre spectacle of men in suits and ties lugging around a battering ram.
You would think that a “non-uniform” law enforcement organization would have a few “riot coveralls” or “squad suits” for such occasions.
As well as the obvious protective benefits, having a few people in such garb would at least provide some uniformed presence and prevent an operation being mistaken for a mafia outing.
An old Shomer‑Tec catalogue I have describes the Topps Squad Suit as “a rugged, low‑cost, professional‑looking garment that can be worn over, or in place of, a uniform during demanding operations.” and suggests keeping one in a patrol vehicle.
The coverall would need some form of distinction. “Law Enforcement” on a back panel would encompass the needs of most potential users. Velcro patches on sleeves and breast for more specific identification.
Elsewhere I have discussed the influence of police uniform colour on both the wearers and those they interact with. The Topps Squad Suit and many similar items come in black or very dark blue. This would be very uncomfortable in sunny locations, and looks very fascist, which may be counter productive. Dark colours also really show up any dirt.
In many parts of the world many civilians dress dark, so there is a potential for misidentification.
A coverall in police blue-green would be useful, and be an economical way to introduce and experiment with the concept.
Possibly the best single choice is “wolf grey”, as is used already by some police tactical units. As a neutral colour, it offers some concealment in many rural or urban environments and low‑light conditions for when this is needed.

Monos

During the Spanish Civil War, many of the militias were formed from factory workers. Many fought in their work overalls and coveralls, known as “monos”. Monos were found in greys, browns and khakis, but many of those of industrial origin were dark blue. One anti-fascist publication even called itself “El Mono Azul”.
Republican fighters wearing overalls and coveralls (monos)
The Soviet Union, Nazi Germany and Italy (among others) supplied the combatants with tanks, aircraft and advisors. Included in the military aid supplied were coveralls for tank crews, air crews and maintenance staff.
Monos became popular, not just for crewmen and technicians, but for front-line use, and not just with the ex-factory workers.
Many Spanish police formations had elaborate duty uniforms that were not suited to hard wear and combat. Police units that traditionally wore blue often selected dark blue monos.
Browns or khaki monos were more common with more conventional military units.
While the fashion of using monos as combat wear probably began with the Republican (left-wing) factory workers, troops on both sides used them.
“Osprey Men-At-Arms 074: The Spanish Civil War 1936‑39” has a number of photos and images of Nationalist (right-wing) troops wearing monos. Osprey Men-At-Arms 498: The Spanish Civil War 1936‑39 (2) Republican Forces” notes that monos were appreciated for their pocket capacity. An International Brigade veteran recalled his comrades buying new ones before the battle of the Ebro in 1938 (MAA 498 p.44).
The Spanish CIvil War had a number of influences on military fashion, but oddly, the mono was not one.
The US Army did experiment with a one-piece jungle-fighting outfit during World War Two. Dysentery was quite common in such campaigns, so the one-piece was found to be “less than ideal” in such situations!

The Bottom Line

That brings me to a “fundamental” issue when selecting a coverall. Does it have a “bomb‑chute” or not? A number of outdoorsmen who have experimented with one‑piece outfits have failed to consider this feature!
Another common error seems to be attempting to use the pocket capacity for dense items such as water bottles and ammunition. Since coveralls are loose in cut, this often proves uncomfortable.
It occurred to me that a coverall or two might be a useful thing for an individual outdoorsman to have available, too.
Coveralls seem warm for their mass and bulk. This may be because you are trapping a single body of air that can freely circulate, rather than separate masses for the lower and upper body. Clothing riding up on your lower back is less of a problem. Coveralls can also be combined with other warm clothing, either over or under.
I suggest that for general use you buy uninsulated coveralls. It is easier to add more insulation under or over than sweat it out in milder conditions. There should be enough room to wear your coveralls over other garments.
With just a shirt and shorts beneath, a coverall should be comfortable in warmer weather.

Bug‑Out Outfits

In previous posts we have talked about the need to have a bug‑out outfit as well as a bug‑out bag. Something that you can don quickly and easily that will provide some protection from the elements and possibly help conceal you from hostile observation.
Many coveralls meet these criteria and will fit over whatever you might happen to be wearing at the time.
A good coverall usually costs less than a combat jacket. Some police riot coveralls include Goretex as well as being fire‑resistant.
If a coverall is a full‑time addition to your bug‑out kit, you can pack the pockets with useful low density gear: hats, gloves, fire kit, cordage, space blanket, compass, plastic mirror, whistle, earplugs, sun glasses and so forth.
If you are going hiking or hunting, a coverall can ride rolled up in your pack until the terrain gets rough or you are away from civilization.
Coveralls that lack a bomb‑hatch tend to be very reasonable in price, being mass produced by the thousands for painters and mechanics.
The main challenge may be finding a set in a suitable tactical colour. Army surplus outlets often have a selection, some of them being intended for tank, AFV and aircraft crewmen. Most examples are single colour, camouflage patterns in such garments being rarer.
Choice of coveralls “with bomb‑hatch” is narrower. Most of the examples I have seen have been tank- or AFV-coveralls.

My First Coverall

I am not a great fan of MTP, since it tends to blob‑out to a khaki‑drab monotone shape. On the other hand, at closer distances the pattern may make dirt or stains less obvious. I was also a little concerned the sand/beige‑coloured monotone AFV‑coveralls might be a little light for general use. I don't intend this garment as my primary camouflage, but khaki‑drab is probably the ideal monotone for British countryside.
What swung it was the MTP coveralls I was offered were cheaper than most alternatives, and were in flame-retardment material!
MTP Flame-retardent Coveralls
When the coverall arrived, I was pleasantly surprised that it was lighter in mass than I expected. I am used to military gear being on the heavy side! The cloth was actually quite soft and comfortable. I would swear it was a good quality poly/cotton, but the label says it is all aramids and other flame‑resistant stuff.
What did puzzle me was the lack of pockets. This example had only two pockets, located on the upper thighs. The examples I had been looking at definitely had chest pockets, among others.
From what I can make out, the British Army currently uses two types of AFV‑coverall.
One type (NSN 8415-99-226-0794) is currently for training only, made from poly/cotton, and of the same design as earlier monotone AFV-coveralls (NSN 8415-99-212-5330), with about a dozen pockets. The exact NATO stock number (NSN) will vary with garment size
The other type, COMBAT FR, MTP for CR2 (NSN: 8415-99-313-5415) is for combat use, made of flame‑retardant materials and of a newer design that has only two pockets!
Because of the camouflage pattern, seeing pocket details can be difficult in on-line photos. The combat coverall has no flaps on the thigh pockets. The training version does, and additional pockets on the chest, hips and lower leg. The older design has a waist drawcord (missing on my example), while the newer uses Velcro waist adjustment.
Pocket detail of the older design is easier to see on photos of the sand/beige‑coloured version.
Sand/Beige AFV-Coveralls showing pocket arrangements

Adding More Pockets

Now, I would rather have pockets and not need them than need them and not have them.
Luckily, I came across a reasonably priced damaged MTP training coverall. The coverall is too small for me, but was designed for someone of my height, so the pockets were be of the right size. Chest size was too small to fit me, but I could salvage the pockets and fit them to my flameproof coverall.
This makes my coverall slightly less flameproof, but I don't drive a tank or an F1 car, and will make an effort to avoid catching fire.
And so I spent a couple of weekends unpicking stitches and sewing pockets onto the newer coverall.
Buy the older pattern poly/cotton “training”coveralls and you can save yourself some sewing.
My coverall now has 15 pockets!
• I added a small internal pocket inside one hip pocket to hold my debit card. Also inside this pocket is a D‑ring I can hang my keys from. (The keys are mounted on a carabineer)
• Added to the left breast pocket is a loop of webbing a snap‑link can be mounted on. This folds away beneath the pen pocket flap when not needed.
The damaged and now pocketless training coverall provides me with a lot of cloth and a couple of zips and Velcro patches for other projects. I may use some of this cloth to reinforce the elbows and knee areas of my coverall. I plan to use some to add some sleeve pockets when the 12 cm zips I have ordered arrive. Armpit vent zips are another option I am considering.
Admittedly, I have not yet put the coverall to particularly challenging uses yet. I jump into it if I want to fetch something from the local shop, hence the debit card pocket and key‑hanger. I don't even need to take my dressing gown off!
It has been quite cold recently but the coverall has been comfortable with just a light hoodie thrown on over it.
Inevitably, when I get back from the shops I often lounge about in the coveralls, and have been quite comfortable without needing the heating on.

Pockets Galore

The modified coverall now has the following pocket arrangement, in addition to those already mentioned:
• Two large chest pockets, with “napoleon” zip-fastened access. Mounted on the outside of each of these is a Velcro-flapped pocket designed to hold four pen or pencil‑like objects.
• Two roomy patch hip pockets, with slanted zip-closure. Zipped pocket closures are a feature many expensive combat and outdoor trousers often lack!
• Two Velcro‑flapped thigh cargo pockets. On the outside of each is a pocket designed to hold and allow the use of a notepad when seated. These are rather like those found on flight suits, but have a sideways opening panel to hide the notepad when not in use. The notepad inserts from one side.
Notepad holder of AFV coveralls
I sewed the thigh pockets to the upper surface of the existing thigh-top pockets the coverall had. These latter pockets are roomy, bellowed and have a side‑zip, allowing them to be accessed when seated.
• There are also two roomy calf‑level cargo pockets. These are probably best used for low density items such as cordage, emergency toilet paper in a ziplock, and a space‑blanket. If I have to use bowyangs with my coverall, I may experiment with passing them under the flap of the calf pockets. Calf pockets are a logical place to store bowyangs.
Adding pockets to a coverall proved to be a relatively simple task. Despite the different material, mine were a near perfect match. It doesn't really matter if the cloth you are using is not an exact match. Variations in hue and shade will add to the disruptive effect.

Zips and Handles

The main zip of the coverall is two-way, opening at each end. This zips up all the way to the points of the collar, rather like a Norwegian Army shirt. The left side is thoughtfully provided with a flap of material that prevents the zip teeth contacting your neck or cheek when the collar is worn open. The older version lacks this flap, but it is easily added.
Decades past, I read a book or comedy skit where a character claims fly zippers were mounted the wrong way, and should pull up to open. The coverall zipper does pull up to open, and that character is actually right! It is much easier to operate such a zipper one‑handed!
And a few days ago I came across some rain pants I brought in British Columbia (where they know about rain!). The zips on the side pockets pull up to open! Something to think about if modifying gear.
A two‑way zip is handy for situations other than a call of nature. You can open the lower end more to access garments and pouches worn under the coveralls.
If you keep your trousers up with a rigger's belt, opening the zip from the bottom allows you to use this, combined with your carabineer keyring.
On the subject of calls of nature, both the training and the combat coverall have a J‑shaped zip at the rear, covered by a Velcro flap.
AFV-coveralls bomb hatch
What appear to be shoulder straps are in fact grab handles. On the newer coverall, these are held down with Velcro so they are less likely to catch on projections within a vehicle or out in the field. A one‑piece garment and such handles allow a wounded or stunned man to be pulled up out of a damaged vehicle.
These handles could be used like shoulder straps to display rank, but would need a wrap‑around rank insignia rather than a slip‑over. Poppers are probably the best way to achieve this, although buttons, Velcro or hook and eye fastening are other options.
Both MTP coveralls have side vents that allow you to access the hip pockets of garments worn underneath. On both coveralls, the left is secured by Velcro and the right by a zipper. I have no idea why!
The right vent could be used to increase air circulation to the coverall interior. I suppose the rear zip could be used in this way too.
I have heard it claimed coveralls are often long in the body or short in the leg, but this example is actually a very good fit for me, and I am long‑legged.
Many old soldiers seem obsessed by the topic of blousing trouser legs. Doesn't matter that young soldiers have inadequate camouflage practice and their vehicles have no armour, rant about those trouser bottoms!
Many coveralls have elasticated ankles, so “problem” solved! If blousing is so essential, why don't combat trousers have the same? (Not really an issue with me, and I am an advocate of gaiters when available).
Many coveralls also have calf zips that allow you to put them on or remove them without removing boots. It also lets you roll up the legs, should there be a need.

Cons

Other than less than the expected number of pockets, my major complaint about the coverall is that the fly (flap of fabric over the main zip) and the baffle (draft excluder flap behind the zip) seem to be made the minimum width necessary. Someone doubtless worked out this would save so much cloth and so many pence per hundred coveralls made.
It would have been nice if the fly had been wide enough to allow popper fastening as an alternative in hot weather to using the main zip. I could always open the lower end of the zip, I suppose, provided there are no objections to me having my flies open!
The main zip and that of the right side vent have a tendency to catch on the fly or the baffle if you are not careful when zipping up. This may be due to the zips themselves, which have quite small teeth. The zips on the training coverall seem better in this respect, although the main zip on mine was the major incidence of damage.
The Velcro on many of the pockets is a potential source of noise, which means you may not wish to access those pockets in certain situations.
The Velcro pile on the sleeve cuff sometimes catches on a square of hook Velcro on the chest pocket, resulting in unintentional noise. Admittedly, this mainly occurs if the cuff has not been fully closed, so is more likely in hot weather. The square of hook holds the pen pocket flap open, so could be removed or covered by various means. Or construct a tape‑like strip of cloth that covers the exposed section of pile on the cuff.

Update

Zips arrived. I based the sleeve pockets on those often seen on many bomber jackets, with a vertical side zip. A five inch zip is a little small for this, even with my small hands, so I would suggest using six-inch.
The armpit zips have an opening less than five inches, but using a smaller zip might have been too fiddly. It is easier to shorten a longer zip.
Reasonably happy on how the sleeve pockets and armpit vent zips have turned out.
The grey zips are much less obvious than the flash photography makes them appear.
Left Sleeve Pocket Added to Coveralls Right Sleeve Pocket added to Coveralls
Coveralls are easily modified or customized. Some of the features described on this page may provide you with inspiration. If anyone is interested, I can provide details and measurements of the pockets I used.
Does a coverall have a place in your outdoor wardrobe? If you are not sure, it is within most of our means to experiment with one of the lower priced examples. It will probably prove useful for something, even if it is just doing the gardening or clearing out the garage.
Just please don't rob any museums.
Categories
Phillosoph

Why a Wakizashi?

Recently, I have been watching the “Rurouni Kenshin” series of movies. “Origins” was a little slow and melodramatic, but the main ones are great entertainment.
The lead character's gimmick is they use a sword with a sharpened back‑edge and a blunt main edge. He clubs enemies down with the main edge in an attempt to not take any more lives.
Close quarter combat with wakizashi
This reminded me of a passage in Don Cunningham's book “Taiho‑Jutsu”:
“For such situations, the machi-kata dōshin [samurai police official] carried a special long jutte, usually with a tapered six- or eight-sided shaft, as their primary weapon and arresting tool. They also only wore one short sword in their obi. The dōshin either grinded the ha (sharpened edge) off their wakizashi or carried special wakizashi forged with extra-thick dull blades. The short blunted wakizashi were considered more suitable for making arrests, especially within confined spaces. A resisting suspect could easily be stunned and immobilized with a strike from such a blade without risking a potentially lethal injury as with a sharpened sword.”
I will admit to being sceptical as to whether anyone ever ground the edge off a perfectly good and valuable wakizashi for such purposes. It seems easier and more effective to fit a suitable strip or billet of iron with sword furnishings.
That such blunted weapons were carried seems possible, since the feudal police seemed to have taken considerable lengths to take their suspect alive.
Why did the police officer have a blunted sword when he already had a jutte? Possibly to show that he had samurai rank. Why did he carry a wakizashi rather than a daishō? The following passages should shed some light on that.
Most readers will know that the samurai wore two swords, known as a “daishō”. It would become enshirned in law that a samurai on official business was required to wear two swords.
Daishō means “big and little” and reflects that the two swords were of differing lengths.
In earlier periods, the daishō might be a tachi and a long tanto. By the Edo period, both weapons were katana, which were worn edge up.
In modern usage “katana” is a term usually used to distinguish the long sword. Historically, the term could be used for either of the daishō, and to distinguish them the terms “uchi‑katana/uchigatana” were used for the longer sword (“daitō”) and “chisa‑katana/chisagatana”, ko‑dachi, kogusoku, ko‑katana, wakizashi or shotō for the shorter.
To avoid confusion, I will reserve the term katana for the longer sword, as is common modern practice.

Why Did The Samurai Carry Two Swords?

Part of the reason was probably symbolic. Two swords was the symbol of a samurai and if you were a samurai, you therefore wore two swords.
Practical explanations for the practice are less satisfying. The short sword was a backup for it the long sword was lost in battle. The short sword was for removing the heads of slain opponents. The short sword was for seppuku.
Other than length, the short and long swords are effectively the same in design. Why a short sword would be better at cutting heads from corpses than a longer variant flies in the face of basic physics. Taking heads was also a task attributed to the kubikiri/kubigiri, which is of a very different form to either of the daishō.
Was the wakizashi carried for seppuku? Most samurai movies seem to use the katana with a cloth or paper wrapped around the blade for grip.
George Cameron Stone's book, “A Glossary of the Construction, Decoration, and Use of Arms and Armor in All Countries and in All Times: Together with Some Closely Related Subjects” (p.658) claims the wakizashi was used for seppuku, but its use had declined in favour of a dagger in more recent periods.
Some samurai fought with a blade in each hand, and utilized their wakizashi in their left. This seems to have been an uncommon practice, however.
Some writers have dismissed the wakizashi as redundant and superfluous. And yet, the wakizashi or weapons like it were widely carried for at least six hundred years!

Safety in the Home

The samurai did not always wear both swords. Etiquette required the long sword not be worn indoors when visiting a superior or another samurai. Wearing the long sword in such a situation was disrespectful, if not outright suspicious and threatening.
In his own home, the long sword might be stored in a rack, or entrusted to a servant for cleaning and sharpening.
When indoors, the samurai only wore his wakizashi, or possibly just a tanto. If the wakizashi was not worn thrust through his sash, it would be within easy reach, such as beside him as he knelt on the floor.
If a samurai was attacked in his home, the wakizashi or tanto would be the weapon most likely to be available.
The wakizash/tanto were the weapons the samurai would have to rely on when he was in most need of a defensive weapon. Not surprisingly, there was a considerable body of training on how to use a wakizashi.
Indoor combat might be at close ranges, so the use of the wakizashi and other weapons was studied in conjunction with grappling techniques. Techniques that could be used while kneeling or seated were also studied. Some techniques involved hindering an attacker drawing their weapon, or taking their weapon and/or using it against them.
For example, as a kneeling attacker attempts to draw a wakizashi, a hand on his wrist may prevent him completing the action. The wrist hold and the other hand are used to unbalance and throw the attacker forward, possibly falling on the exposed edge of his own blade.
If he could afford it, a samurai would see that both swords of a daishō would have matching fittings and decoration. Ideally both were made by the same craftsmen. Stone suggests that the wakizashi would often be the more ornately decorated, since this is the sword that would be worn during indoor social occasions.
The wakizashi was also the one of the pair likely to mount accessories and implements such as the kogai and kozuka. This made these items available when the long sword was not being worn. This approach may have also prevented the possibility of the kogai and kozuka interfering with the draw of the long sword. Kogai and kozuka were sometimes used as expedient bo-shuriken, so having them with the wakizashi might have given the wearer another option if attacked indoors.

Something for the Ladies

Samurai women were expected to fight in defence of their homes and persons. The naginata was the usual weapon of choice, but instruction was given in the use of the wakizashi and dagger and include the kusarigama.
The naginata and kusarigama are relatively long‑ranged weapons. If an enemy got too close, or combat was indoors, the wakizashi or dagger were a useful alternative.

For Lord and Commoner

Only the samurai were permitted to wear the daishō. In addition, commoners (non‑samurai) were not allowed to have long swords.
What is not so commonly know is that commoners were permitted to have short swords.
Cunningham notes (p.22):
“While katana (long swords) were prohibited, chōnin [townspeople] and nōmin [farmers] were still allowed to carry tanto (daggers) as well as short swords known as wakizashi. For many years after the end of the Japanese civil wars, though, commoners did not always abide by the laws prohibiting swords. One reason was that the actual measurements used to define katana, wakizashi, and tanto were confusing and often inconsistently applied in many of these laws. Thus during the early part of the Edo period (early1600s), some chōnin, and especially yakuza, or criminal gang members, openly carried long wakizashi that were virtually equivalent to prohibited katana.”
It was not until 1645 that a law defined the maximum blade length of katana as 2 shaku 8 or 9 sun (33.5 to 34.5‑inches/85.5 to 87.5 cm) and wakizashi as 1 shaku 8 or 9 sun (21.5 to 22.5‑inches/55.5 to 57.5 cm). [figures and conversions from Cunningham]
In 1668, chōnin were restricted to carrying ko‑wakizashi of blade no longer than 1 shaku 5 sun (approximately 17.5 inches or 45.5 cm) without official permission. There was no restriction on a commoner wearing a ko‑wakizashi, but it was unlikely for the weapon to be worn when on day‑to‑day business.
Later amendments permitted the carrying of “full‑sized” wakizashi under certain circumstances, such as travel and fire.
A travelling commoner was allowed to carry a wakizashi as a defence against robbers.
Fires were common in feudal Japanese towns. Commoners forced from their homes by the threat of fire were permitted to carry wakizashi to protect what other possessions they had managed to carry with them.
Serge Moll, in “Classical Weaponry of Japan” (p.19) notes an alternate name for a short sword was “dochuzashi”: “Dochu literally means “while on the street” or “while on a journey,” so one could describe a dochuzashi as a short sword inserted in the sash while one was traveling.”
The characters commonly used to spell wakizashi may be read as meaning “insert at the side”. The practice of wearing the daishō was termed “nihonzashi” (“insert two (swords)”)
Moll also gives a definition of ko‑wakizashi as between 30 and 40 cm, and that longer ones (up to 60 centimetres) were called Owakizashi (“big wakizashi”)
Doubtless, a commoner would avail themselves of their wakizashi or ko‑wakizashi in the event of a burglary or home invasion.
The short swords owned by commoners were probably more utilitarian and lower priced than that owned by a prosperous samurai. For every famed Japanese swordsmith, there were probably scores of blacksmiths turning out commoners' blades.

What is in a Name?

Time I addressed the topic of terminology.
Some Wikipedia articles and other websites use very narrow definitions of some of the terms that have been used in this article. A wakazashi is this! A kodachi is a quite different thing and is this! And so on. There is little credible precedent for these narrow and exact definitions, and they may prove counterproductive to your actual understanding.
We are talking a considerable period of history, large geographical area, varying levels of education and often no centralized system of standardization.
The distinction between tantos, kodachi, wakizashi, shotō etc are in practice less distinct and more fuzzy than is represented by some modern writers. Often these terms were used interchangeably or with a degree of overlap.
Moll: “The meaning of the terms “long sword” and “short sword” changed over the centuries. Nowadays, all swords that are shorter than two shaku (approximately 60 centimeters)! but longer than one shaku (approximately 30 centimeters) are called shotō, or “short swords.””
This definition nicely encompasses all wakizashi, but also includes some tantos and other Japanese knives. Moll also notes some ryu define their kogusoku/kodachi techniques as being for tanto and short swords of “up to 36 cm length”. Other ryu consider kogusoku/kodachijutsu to be methods for tanto/knife and/or short sword and it is quite probable in some cases the latter refers to wakizashi.
Some of you will know the “‑to” part of the term tanto actually designates that the hilt has a sword‑type guard. You will see some sources refer to tanto as “short swords” or “swords”. Other identical forms and sizes of Japanese blade, fitted to different varieties of hilt, are never called a sword. This is confusing to a reader not aware of the word's origin, when the weapon is clearly a knife or dagger in form and function.
“Dagger” itself is a problematic term, since it has been misappropriated and misused by the legal systems of certain American states, creating the false impression that the term only applies to double‑edged weapons.
Cameron Stone observes the term seems to be applied to any variety of knife, save a clasp knife. (p.198)

Wakizashi in Combat

We have seen the wakizashi/shotō was used by samurai and commoner, and by both men and women. How effective a weapon is it?
If you have ever handled a real, full‑length sword, be it Japanese or otherwise, you may have been surprised. Length and mass add up to considerable inertia. Keeping such a sword under control needs strength, conditioning and considerable practise.
Fencing swords are a possible exception to the above statement, although it is debatable if those used as sporting equipment should be considered real swords.
A shorter blade, such as a wakizashi or machete, is another thing entirely. They are light and agile.
Moll (p.21) comments that the greater speed of a wakizashi made to more effective than a longer sword against fast attacks by longer weapons such as spear thrusts.
Long weapons such as spears and naginata, tend to have an optimum range within which they are most effective. If one can close within this distance, the advantage of the longer weapon is often lost and the user may be at a considerable disadvantage.
The speed of a wakizashi improved the chances of parrying an initial attack so that distance could be closed. The wakizashi's greater manoeuvrability was an advantage when distance was reduced, since it was easier to apply either the edge or point than with a longer and heavier sword.
If using a long weapon and an enemy attempted to close distance, the wakizashi was also a good choice for a backup weapon to deal with close range threats.
The combination of a long weapon and a shorter one may be seen in some other cultures. The German landsknecht, with his pike, halberd or zweihander wore a short sword called a katzbalger (“cabbage cutter”). The huntsman with a boar spear often wore a long wood knife or hanger.
The wakizashi is short enough to be used for the close‑range fighting techniques of kogusoku/kodachijutsu but long enough to use the daitō techniques taught in kenjutsu.
The lighter weight and reduced inertia made a wakizashi more responsive and effective than a longer sword if used in one hand. Its ability to be used one‑handed and shorter length allowed use of the wakizashi to be combined with strikes and grappling attacks from the other hand. The use of a wakizashi could be combined with weapons wielded in the other hand, such as a jutte, tessen (fan), tanto or manrikigusari.
The wakizashi was also a more practical weapon to use in one's weaker hand. Nitoken was often practiced with the wakizashi in the left hand and a katana in the right (all Japanese swordsmen were taught to fight with their right hand as primary). Figure 1-8 of Moll's book shows nitoken using a kodachi in each hand, an interesting variation with considerable potential, particularly if used with the principles of long har chuan.
Being shorter and lighter, a wakizashi may be drawn in less time than a longer sword. I suspect the wakizashi will often taste blood while the katana is still leaving the station. I have come across references to Japanese bodyguards wearing short blades in full‑length sheaths as a deception.
As we have seen, the wakizashi might be used for combat indoors, and seems well suited for the purpose. Using a katana indoors may not have been as practical and elegant as the movies make it seem. A traditional Japanese ceiling was only 220 to 240 cm high, which must have hindered some of the classic kenjutsu moves. How many samurai embedded their katana in a rafter and fell victim to a wakizashi, one wonders. Not all the walls were paper, so narrow corridors may also have hindered a swordsman too.
One begins to appreciate why the ninja favoured short blades for their ninjato.
This is doubtless the reason why the machi-kata dōshin described above carried a blunted wakizashi and not a katana. There was a good chance he might have to fight indoors, and a wakizashi‑length weapon was superior to a katana in such locations.
This more in‑depth look at the wakizashi has made me think about other warriors that used short weapons, such as the Egyptian with his kopesh, and the Roman with his gladius. The shorter gladius was obviously handier during the close press of massed combat. Did it also over an advantage parrying against spears and longer weapons? Shaka invented the short ilkwa, giving the Zulus a significant advantage over most of their enemies.
I have liked wakizashis from the first time I handled one. The above research and analysis shows my initial gut reaction was not off target.
I have also learnt they have a much broader and significant history than is generally known. It was an important weapon for commoner and noble alike.
The wakizashi is overshadowed by the katana. Short swords don't look as good up on the screen as long ones. The wakizashi is probably a much more practical choice, particularly those of use who do not have the necessary time needed to master the inertia of longer weapons.
I have a replica wakizashi that is of particular interest. It has a 20 inch blade and an eight and a half inch grip.
Not particularly long‑bladed for a wakizashi, but long enough for most tasks I might ask of it. It is longer than many machetes, for example. It only looks short if you put it alongside a full‑length katana. The shorter weapon handles much better.
The eight and a half inch handle is a nice feature. This is longer than is found on some wakizashi, and gives a shade more leverage when using two‑handed techniques.
The Japanese blade shape is widely recognized as an efficient design. There is good reason it changed little for hundreds of years. Slightly curved for a more effective cutting action, straight enough to allow the point to easily be brought into action.
I have a modernized “ninjato” of similar dimensions. Grip a shade longer, blade a little shorter. People who have handled this sword react very positively to it, often surprising themselves. It just feels right!
I have a better quality wakizashi, longer blade and shorter grip. The oval section of the handle is less sharp and more comfortable, but it is the 20+8 that feels right.
A typical single doorway is 28 inches wide. Unless, for some bizarre reason I hold my wakizashi sideways and horizontal, a doorway is little obstruction to me when holding a wakizashi.
If, by some freak of chance that I ever have enough money to have a sword custom made for me, I think I might actually opt for a 20 inch wakizashi with an eight and a half inch grip. It is probably a far more practical and versatile option than a longer weapon.
Many years ago, this blog looked at Marc MacYoung’s suggestion on using a sword for home defence. To the comments already made there, I will add that you pay special attention to length and inertia. The reasons for my saying so should be obvious by now.
In some parts of the world, pointless local laws may prevent you owning a katana unless you are rich enough to buy antiques. Some of these laws permit a blade of 50 cm or less, which ironically may result in you getting a more effective weapon!
Many years ago, I read an article where the author noted that if you did want to own a genuine antique Japanese blade, buying a wakizashi might be the better option, since prices were often more bearable.
Wakizashis are not your only choice, of course. Many of the benefits already described also apply to machetes, barongs, kindjal, goloks, hangers, falchion and kukris, to name just a few.
To finish, a rather nice video:

There are several things to note here.
Note how the wakizashi attacks and defences come from a low position. This will be familiar to some of you from the baton, entrenching tool and machete techniques in “Crash Combat”. This is much more useful than waving a weapon around over your head.
Note the wooden wakizashi is gripped a short distance below the guard, protecting the hand from any forceful blows the guard may take.
Also, note how the wakizashi allows one hand to shield the eyes against the sun while the polished surface of the blade would be used to reflect sunlight back at the attacker's eyes.
Categories
Phillosoph

Morse Code without Electricity

Recently I was recently reading a science fiction novel. The crew of a spaceship are without power, and have to warn another ship to keep its distance. They can be seen at a window. They resort of pantomiming “pushing‑away” actions. Using Morse code does not seem to occur to them.
Mountain Morse Code
How do you use Morse code without electricity? There are ways to do this, and they are possibly not so well known as some other methods.
The first method is taken from this useful website. It has a passing resemblance to semaphore, but uses standard Morse code, which is far more likely to be known by the sender or viewer.
Two Flag Morse Code Signalling
You do not need to have flags to use this system. You can use the motions if your hands are empty. Holding a scarf, bandana or branch in each hand may be used to make your motions more visible. Coloured stuffsacks may be stretched over a flexible stick bent into a racket-shape. Depending on the background, taking off dark‑coloured gloves or wearing lighter gloves may aid empty‑handed signalling.
Back when I was blogging about American Civil War outfits, I read the book “Hardtack and Coffee”. A fascinating book, which finished with a chapter on the pre‑Morse signalling system used during the war.
This system, called “Wigwag” in some other sources, used a single flag (or disc).
This system may also be used with Morse code, and may be still referred to as “wigwag” or “wig‑wag”.
Single Flag Morse Signalling
The convention here is a little different to that used with two‑flags. Flag up is “ready” or “word begins” rather than “dot”.
“Dot” (Two) is starboard: to the right of the signaller, to the left of the observer. Easily remembered because we read from left to right in English.
“Dash” (One) is port, as in “a dash of port”.
No flag? You can use the single pole method with a rifle, a hiking pole or a branch. Add a scarf to the end or anything else that makes your signal more visible.
You can also clasp your hands together as though you are about to dive and point your straightened arms up, down, left and right. Point them straight ahead between dots and dashes.
That said, my personal feeling is that the two-flag method is better for empty handed signalling. The shapes made are more distinct and wider or taller.
In these days of electronic warfare and eavesdropping, such simple visual methods of signalling still have a place. Establish a shorthand of one, two and three letter signals.

Non‑Electric Morse at Night

If you want to signal at night, you may flash a light. If your light cannot easily be turned on or off, you may be able to cover it with your hand, hat, map or similar.
This is not so easy if you are using a light source such as a burning brand. When viewed at a distance at night, a single light source can appear to move about even when it is not moving. “Hardtack and Coffee” tells us:
“The services of the Signal Corps were just as needful and valuable by night as in daylight; but, as the flags could not then talk understandingly, Talking Torches were substituted for them. As a “point of reference” was needful, by which to interpret the torch signals made, the flagman lighted a “foot torch,” at which he stood firmly while he signalled with the “flying torch.” This latter was attached to a staff of the same length as the flagstaff, in fact, usually the flagstaff itself. These torches were of copper, and filled with turpentine. At the end of a message the flying torch was extinguished.”
Our spacemen in the book could have used a non‑electric method of Morse signalling. Perhaps a piece of material with a different symbol and/or colour drawn on each side. Later in the book the natives of a planet signal using a pivoted disc painted white on one side, black on the other. It is commented that this is the local equivalent to Morse.

Morse by Sound

Morse signalling with sound was not an option for the spacers.
Often in movies, someone will bang on pipes and a character will identify it as “Morse code”. Morse needs two distinct signals, so most Morse letters cannot be transmitted with a single note such as a tap on a pipe. The code you need for this is POW tap code.
One of the few messages you can transmit with a single note is SOS (…—…). With a signal whistle, you make three short blasts, three longer blasts, then three more short, no pauses between the letters.
If you are drumming against a tree trunk or piece of wreckage, you cannot do this. Instead you vary the interval between the notes: three quick notes, three notes with a longer pause after each, then three more quick.
I have recently updated my blog on learning Morse with some new reference and some new tricks to help you remember certain letters.